Wednesday, June 8, 2011

Thoughts on US involvement in Afghanistan

In the Torah, there is a famous story about Jacob wrestling with an angel. After wrestling with an angel all night, Jacob receives the new name of Israel. The word “Israel” literally means the man who “wrestles with an angel.”

I have always felt that one of the most unique things about being Jewish is the fact that we are not afraid to ask and to “wrestle with” very difficult questions. The question that I want to ask at this time is whether or not the United States should still be committing forces to Afghanistan.

Back when we wrestled with the Vietnam War, this felt deeply personal for I had a low draft number. American Jews were quite vocal in their opposition to that war. Now without a draft and fewer Jewish young men in the armed forces, it seems to me that our voices are conspicuously silent.

First a little background.

Our congregation has had several members who have served in Afghanistan. Two of them have been previously deployed in Iraq. I heard from one recently who told me that in addition to being hot and having lousy living conditions, the security situation there was much worse than in Iraq and that the level of personal danger to U.S. soldiers was quite high. He also expressed some reservation that the current government would ever be able to control the country.

During the Bush presidency, the Union for Reform Judaism made a controversial resolution concerning Iraq and calling for a timetable for withdrawal. Should we not also consider some sort of resolution concerning Afghanistan?

A year ago after General Stanley McChrystal made statements which eventually led to his being relieved of command, it became clearer to me that President Obama had listened to the voices of the military who had called for an ill-thought-out escalation. I was against the escalation at the time and actually drafted a URJ resolution calling for the President and Congress to bring home swiftly and safely all U.S. troops and military, CIA, and similar contract personnel from Afghanistan. The resolution was not considered by the movement. Yet, one year later, we find both Republican and Democrat voices asking for a reconsideration of American involvement in Afghanistan.

This past month, thirty-one American soldiers died in Afghanistan. At our services, we read the names of all thirty-one of these men and women. I feel so much for their families and I truly appreciate their loyalty and service to our county. To me, they are heroes! Each one of them represented a world unto himself or herself.

Nearly ten years have passed since the war in Afghanistan began. This is the longest running war in U.S. history. Moreover, the cost of this war is estimated at being ten billion dollars per month. Now that Bin Laden has been killed, many American politicians on both sides of the aisle are asking whether or not it is worthwhile for America to still have troops in Afghanistan. This is especially true at this time of economic hardship when cuts to both healthcare services and education are being made throughout the country on both the federal and state levels.

In addition, it seems to me that the U.S. war in Afghanistan has paralyzed and distorted U.S. foreign policy in two far more crucial areas of the world.

First, over the last decade, the coalition of forces led by the United States has been preoccupied first with Iraq and now with Afghanistan. While this has occurred, the present Iranian government has pursued the development of nuclear technology. Despite the fact that Iran has repeatedly asserted that this is aimed at civilian nuclear energy, most observers have found much evidence to suggest that Iran is indeed pursuing a nuclear weapon. We will never know for sure, but I feel that without the foreign policy preoccupation with Iraq and Afghanistan, our efforts to contain Iran’s nuclear development could have been different and possibly more effective.

Second, it seems to me that the U.S. war in Iraq and Afghanistan created a lack of focus on our part towards a robust effort at civil society building within in the Arab world over the past decade. The recent events of the so called “Arab Spring” in Egypt and elsewhere illustrate how very important such an effort could have been. As dictators have fallen, the absence of the structures of civil society left a tremendous vacuum. This vacuum presents an opportunity to radical and anti-Western Islamic factions to exploit for the purpose of creating radical Islamic governments.

So here is my point.

Why are we being so silent about this war?

At a time of economic pressures unprecedented in 70 years, cannot the $120 billion we are spending yearly in Afghanistan be used much more wisely both at home and in pursuing our foreign policy agenda across the globe? Do we really support continued American involvement in Afghanistan? Is it really fair to the men and women in our armed forces, some of whom have served more than three tours of duty, to ask them to continue such service?

I think we owe it to the men and women in our armed services and to ourselves to “wrestle” with these most serious questions. I think we owe it to our country to consider whether or not now is the time to expeditiously bring our troops home.

Finally, in any war which our leaders become engaged, there should be a reasonable expectation of success. However, there is in Jewish law a principle which maintains that a non-biblical rule which is not working, or is not accepted, or is not successful in meeting its goal, should be changed. Is now the time for such a change?

The above opinion is mine and mine alone. It does not represent that of the congregation or of the Union for Reform Judaism.

I would really like to hear your opinion on this. I value your opinion and would invite dialogue on this issue. Please let me know if you think that our movement should take a position on this issue. Please post your comments on the blog.

1 comment:

  1. Rabbi Guttman,

    I enjoyed reading your thoughts on US involvement in Afghanistan. I agree with you, and, in fact, have felt since the beginning of both wars there were more effective, nonviolent means of accomplishing our foreign policy goals.

    Unfortunately, the fear of being labeled "unpatriotic" or "naive" prevented many like-minded people in the US from speaking out publicly against the military operations. Deferring to our elected officials, we put our faith in them and hoped their good judgment would see us through. Many now see the error in our thinking (and hoping).

    $120 billion could have done an amazing amount of good in the world and in our own country. Perhaps it is a little naïve of us to believe that kind of money would have been spent on creating good will and trust and on forging bonds of friendship across the globe if we had chosen a path other than war. Nevertheless, it is a wonderful thought. Thank you for sharing it.

    Karen Slone

    ReplyDelete